
The Seller’s Dashboard: News, Alerts & Action Plans
For eCommerce sellers in 2025, the decision to sell on Amazon or Walmart isn’t just about brand visibility or logistics—it’s about margins. Profit margins are the lifeblood of any business, and choosing the wrong platform can mean the difference between scaling and sinking.
Both Amazon and Walmart dominate the online retail space, but their ecosystems are starkly different. In this post, we’ll break down the key differences in fees, competition, customer base, fulfillment models, and overall seller experience to help you figure out where your bottom line stands a better chance of survival.
Amazon owns nearly 40% of the U.S. eCommerce market in 2025. With over 300 million active customer accounts and the convenience of Prime, it offers sellers enormous reach—but that reach comes at a price. Literally.
Walmart has made aggressive moves to capture online market share, with Walmart.com now serving over 150 million monthly visitors. Its marketplace is more curated and has stricter onboarding, but fewer sellers mean less competition in many categories.
Amazon’s fee structure can eat into profits quickly, especially for small-margin products. While FBA boosts visibility and logistics, it adds layers of cost that need to be carefully calculated.
Walmart tends to be more transparent with fees and doesn’t pile on hidden charges, making it a leaner option for margin-conscious sellers.
Margin Winner: Walmart. Lower overall costs and no monthly subscription make it more favorable for sellers trying to preserve margins.
With over 9 million sellers globally and thousands in each category, standing out requires aggressive advertising (PPC), promotions, and sometimes loss-leader pricing just to win the Buy Box. More competition equals lower margins, unless you’re a brand with strong differentiation.
Walmart Marketplace is more selective, meaning fewer sellers in each category. While visibility isn’t as plug-and-play as Amazon’s algorithmic machine, getting noticed is easier due to reduced saturation.
Margin Winner: Walmart. Less competition helps keep prices—and blood pressure—higher.
Pros:
Cons:
Pros:
Cons:
Margin Winner: Toss-up. If you’re moving volume and need scale, FBA still dominates. But for leaner operations, WFS gives you more control and potentially better margins.
They’re spoiled. They expect free 2-day shipping, hassle-free returns, and discounts on everything. This behavior pressures sellers to underprice, over-deliver, and absorb costs of returns—which cuts straight into your margins.
More price-sensitive but also less entitled. Return rates tend to be lower, and expectations around shipping speed and convenience are still catching up to Amazon’s standard.
Margin Winner: Walmart. Less demanding customers = fewer margin-eroding expenses.
A necessary evil. To gain visibility, especially as a new seller, you’ll need to spend heavily on Amazon Ads. CPCs (cost-per-click) have climbed steadily through 2024–2025, making customer acquisition expensive.
Walmart’s ad platform is still developing but currently has much lower CPCs compared to Amazon. This means more bang for your marketing buck, especially in less saturated niches.
Margin Winner: Walmart. Lower ad spend = more take-home profit.
If your top priority is preserving and growing your margins in 2025, Walmart comes out ahead. It offers a lower-cost ecosystem, less competition, and a customer base that doesn’t expect gold-plated delivery trucks.
However, Amazon still leads in traffic, brand trust, and conversion rates—so if volume and scale are more important than raw margin, it’s hard to beat. Ideally? Sell on both. Diversify. Be everywhere your customers are—but know where your profits are hiding.
Margins aren’t just about selling more—they’re about selling smarter. Amazon may be the jungle, but Walmart is looking more like an oasis in 2025.
Let’s sum it up:
Category | Winner |
Seller Fees | Walmart |
Competition | Walmart |
Fulfillment | Tie |
Return Policies | Walmart |
Advertising Costs | Walmart |